| Fiesta-Si.com https://www.fiesta-si.com/forums/ |
|
| 2.0 ka?? https://www.fiesta-si.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=18135 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | d00ner [ Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | 2.0 ka?? |
will a 2.0 conversion into a mk1 ka be the same as it would into a si? i assume not because its cvh, not zetec to start with, but im really hoping it is. anybody? |
|
| Author: | Percy [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
I don't believe it is, it would be easier to put a RST engine in. |
|
| Author: | meilack [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
it's a ballache, but do-able  you have to cut out some of the slam panel, put actual bonnet vents in the bonnet to stop the cambelt cover hitting it, as well as bonnet raisers to fit the induction pipe and its so cramped anything that needs doing is an engine out job, but apart from that, easy  RST engine slots in well to 
|
|
| Author: | d00ner [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
adam your description above, is that for a rst or zetec? rst would be good 
|
|
| Author: | meilack [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
2.0 zetec thats what i read on a fast ford featured one it needed cossie vents in the bonnet, that were actual vents  2.0 zetec = 130bhp reliable na power in a light car same with a rst engine minus maybe reliability
|
|
| Author: | d00ner [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
the 1.3s are cvh right? so would share mounts? if so then ill go rst, as it saves the ballache. reliabilities not an issue, it wont be for the road
|
|
| Author: | meilack [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
nope, the 1.3 is a endura-e or later ones are duratec so not a cvh, so still a mount problem
|
|
| Author: | rob_fiesta [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
| Author: | d00ner [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
is there anything that fits straight in? i really want a standard looking sleeper. even leaving teh hub caps on 
|
|
| Author: | meilack [ Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
not straight bolt in as far as i know. Mount changing isn't that hard for a cvh so i have been told even an na cvh one would be quick  108bhp and 110lb/ft in a light ka
|
|
| Author: | happypaul [ Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
Fit a RST engine. Zetecs look too cramped. Seen loads done, fair enough but it looks a right mess specially with the bonnet options. Power to weight wise, not much difference than a fiesta other than your driving a girly looking shell instead lol |
|
| Author: | meilack [ Thu Nov 26, 2009 8:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
sport ka's handle immensely to 
|
|
| Author: | onslack [ Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
i'd have/drive an rst ka any day 
|
|
| Author: | meilack [ Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
i want my sport ka back 
|
|
| Author: | cs detailing [ Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
| Author: | meilack [ Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2.0 ka?? |
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|