depends on gearbox fitted
| Fiesta-Si.com https://www.fiesta-si.com/forums/ |
|
| Those with 2.0 conversions..... https://www.fiesta-si.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23567 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | BLU [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
What sort of MPG (or miles to £x if easier) do you get. I'm looking for a more fuel efficient car but with a bit of go. I definitely don't want a dull diesel eurobox....... |
|
| Author: | meilack [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
depends on gearbox fitted
|
|
| Author: | - Danny Boy - [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
Can depend on what gearbox you use sometimes, some have different ratios, for instance the diesel 5th gear is long, so you can cruise at 70 at about 2k rpm I think, thats more fuel efficient. |
|
| Author: | will121 [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
i wouldnt just dismiss a Diesel, i also run a 150bhp diesel vectra a the torque of a diesel can make it feel quick especially if you chip it |
|
| Author: | DanFraser [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
I've always wondered about the MPG on a 2L with a good 5th. My 1.6 is doing crappy MPG simply because it's now older than the bloody planet. |
|
| Author: | BLU [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
| Author: | 32coupe [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
i used to get 60 mile to £20 last yrs prices |
|
| Author: | happypaul [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
I'm currently doing 35mpg a tank. Thats a 2.0ltr with cams, ported head, racing manifold with no cat, erst gearbox and a heavy right foot. |
|
| Author: | fiestasiphil [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
on a long run my 2 litre si did 44mpg with a erst gearbox non stop distance of 360miles |
|
| Author: | happypaul [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
Driving like a granny Phil? Lol |
|
| Author: | andyleesy [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
| Author: | andyleesy [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
...That was standard 2.0 with cat-back and induction cone. 1.8 TB |
|
| Author: | fiestasiphil [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
| Author: | Elward [ Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
I heard there pretty good on fuel, there a nice torquey engine so dont need to rev the cunt off it to get some go. |
|
| Author: | - Danny Boy - [ Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Those with 2.0 conversions..... |
Mine is actually doing really well on fuel, and I have been giving the beans everywhere!! Done about 100 miles to quarter of a tank, which i think is pretty damn good! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|